My little Lamb, what is amiss?
If there was milk in mother's kiss,
You would not look as white as this.
The wolf of Hunger, it is he
That takes away thy milk from me,
And I have much to do for thee.
If thou couldst live on love, I know
No babe in all the land could show
More rosy cheeks and louder crow.
Thy father's dead, Alas for thee:
I cannot keep this wolf from me,
That takes thy milk so bold and free.
If thy dear father lived, he'd drive
Away this beast with whom I strive,
And thou, my pretty Lamb, wouldst thrive.
Ah, my poor babe, my love's so great
I'd swallow common rags for meat—
If they could make milk rich and sweet.
My little Lamb, what is amiss?
Come, I must wake thee with a kiss,
For Death would own a sleep like this.
W. H. Davies’ The Starved is a hauntingly poignant poem that captures the despair of a mother unable to nourish her child due to extreme poverty. Through stark imagery, emotional directness, and a deeply personal lament, Davies explores themes of hunger, maternal love, and socio-economic suffering. The poem’s simplicity belies its profound emotional weight, as it speaks to universal human fears—maternal helplessness, the specter of death, and the cruel inequalities of survival. Written in Davies’ characteristically accessible yet evocative style, The Starved resonates with both historical specificity and timeless relevance.
This analysis will examine the poem’s historical context, its use of literary devices, its thematic concerns, and its emotional impact. Additionally, we will consider how Davies’ own life experiences—marked by poverty and hardship—inform the poem’s raw authenticity. By situating The Starved within the broader tradition of social protest poetry, we can appreciate its power as both a personal cry of anguish and a broader indictment of societal neglect.
William Henry Davies (1871–1940) was a Welsh poet and writer whose work often reflected his experiences of poverty and vagrancy. Unlike many of his contemporaries in the Georgian poetry movement, Davies wrote from firsthand knowledge of deprivation. His early life was marked by instability: he spent years as a tramp in both England and America, lost a leg in a train-hopping accident, and struggled to establish himself as a writer. This background lends his poetry an authenticity that more privileged poets could not replicate.
The Starved emerges from this lived experience of want. While the poem does not specify a particular historical moment, it aligns with the widespread poverty of late 19th- and early 20th-century Britain, a period marked by economic disparity, inadequate welfare systems, and high infant mortality rates. The Industrial Revolution had created vast wealth for some, but for many working-class families, survival was precarious. The poem’s depiction of a mother unable to feed her child would have been tragically familiar to many readers of the time.
Davies employs a conversational yet lyrical tone, using direct address to create an intimate, almost unbearable immediacy. The mother speaks to her child as "my little Lamb," a term of endearment that also evokes innocence and vulnerability. The lamb metaphor extends throughout the poem, reinforcing the child’s helplessness while also invoking biblical imagery—lambs as symbols of purity and sacrifice.
The poem’s most striking device is its personification of hunger as a predatory wolf. This metaphor transforms an abstract condition into a tangible, malevolent force:
"The wolf of Hunger, it is he
That takes away thy milk from me,
And I have much to do for thee."
The wolf is not merely an external threat but an active aggressor, "bold and free" in its theft of sustenance. This imagery aligns with traditional folklore, where wolves represent danger and voracity. By framing hunger as a beast, Davies underscores its relentless, animalistic nature—it does not reason or relent; it simply consumes.
The poem’s structure reinforces its emotional cadence. The short lines and repetitive questioning ("My little Lamb, what is amiss?") mimic a lullaby or a mother’s soothing murmurs, but the content subverts this tenderness. The final stanza’s abrupt shift—from despair to a desperate attempt to rouse the child—suggests the mother’s realization that her baby may already be dead:
"Come, I must wake thee with a kiss,
For Death would own a sleep like this."
The euphemistic phrasing ("a sleep like this") underscores the unbearable reality she faces, forcing the reader to confront the possibility of the child’s death without explicit statement.
At its core, The Starved is a meditation on the cruel intersection of love and powerlessness. The mother’s affection is profound—she claims that if love alone could nourish, her child would be the healthiest alive:
"If thou couldst live on love, I know
No babe in all the land could show
More rosy cheeks and louder crow."
Yet this love is tragically insufficient against material deprivation. The poem thus becomes a bitter commentary on the limits of emotion in the face of systemic neglect. The mother’s willingness to "swallow common rags for meat" if it would transform into milk is both hyperbolic and heartbreaking, emphasizing the extremes of her desperation.
The absence of the father further compounds her isolation. His death is presented not just as a personal loss but as a structural one—had he lived, he could have "driven away this beast." This suggests that poverty is not merely an individual misfortune but a societal failure, where the loss of a single breadwinner can doom a family.
What makes The Starved so devastating is its restraint. Davies does not indulge in melodrama; instead, the poem’s power lies in its quiet anguish. The mother’s voice is tender, even as she articulates unbearable sorrow. This duality—gentle language paired with horrific subject matter—creates a dissonance that lingers with the reader.
The poem also invites broader philosophical questions: What does it mean to love in the face of futility? How does society fail its most vulnerable? While rooted in a specific historical moment, The Starved transcends its time, speaking to any context where poverty and inequality render parental love tragically inadequate.
Davies’ poem can be usefully compared to other works of social protest poetry, such as Thomas Hood’s The Song of the Shirt (1843) or Blake’s The Chimney Sweeper (1789). Like these poems, The Starved personalizes suffering, making abstract economic forces felt through individual lives. However, Davies’ approach is less explicitly polemical than Hood’s or Blake’s; his critique is implicit, woven into the fabric of personal grief.
In the broader tradition of maternal elegies, The Starved also recalls Ben Jonson’s On My First Son or Katherine Philips’ Epitaph on Her Son H.P., but with a crucial difference: where those poems mourn a loss that has already occurred, Davies’ speaker hovers on the precipice of loss, amplifying the horror.
The Starved is a masterful blend of simplicity and depth, using minimal language to convey profound suffering. Through its vivid metaphors, emotional directness, and socio-historical resonance, the poem transforms personal grief into a universal lament. Davies’ own experiences of hardship lend the work an authenticity that resonates across generations, reminding us that poetry is not merely an aesthetic exercise but a vital medium for bearing witness to human suffering.
In an era where food insecurity persists globally, The Starved remains painfully relevant. Its power lies in its ability to make the reader feel, viscerally, the agony of a mother who cannot save her child—not for lack of love, but for lack of bread. And in that feeling, perhaps, lies the first step toward change.
Click the button below to print a cloze exercise of the poem critique. This exercise is designed for classroom use.