Let a joy keep you
Reach out your hands
And take it when it runs by,
As the Apache dancer
Clutches his woman
I have seen them
Live long and laugh loud,
Sent on singing, singing,
Smashed to the heart
Under the ribs
With a terrible love
Joy always,
Joy everywhere—
Let joy kill you!
Keep away from the little deaths.
Carl Sandburg’s Joy is a compact yet profound meditation on the intensity of human emotion, urging the reader to embrace joy with the same fervor and abandon as one might approach love or even death. The poem, like much of Sandburg’s work, is deeply rooted in the American vernacular, drawing from both the raw energy of the natural world and the unrefined vitality of working-class life. Written in free verse, Joy rejects traditional poetic constraints, instead relying on vivid imagery, imperative commands, and a rhythmic urgency that propels its central theme: the necessity of seizing joy with full, almost reckless commitment.
This essay will explore Joy through multiple lenses—its historical and cultural context, its literary and rhetorical devices, and its philosophical underpinnings—before considering its emotional resonance and broader implications. Sandburg’s poem, though brief, encapsulates a worldview that is at once celebratory and fatalistic, suggesting that joy is not merely an emotion to be experienced passively but a force to be grasped violently, even at the risk of self-destruction.
Sandburg, a key figure in American modernist poetry, was deeply influenced by the social and economic upheavals of the early 20th century. His work often reflects the struggles and triumphs of the working class, and Joy can be read as both an affirmation of life amid hardship and a rejection of the stifling conformity of industrialized society. The poem’s reference to the "Apache dancer" is particularly significant, as it evokes a cultural archetype of unrestrained passion. The Apache dance, derived from Parisian interpretations of Indigenous American movement, was known for its dramatic, almost violent physicality—a fitting metaphor for the kind of joy Sandburg describes.
The early 20th century was also a time of profound existential questioning, with World War I and the rise of industrialization prompting many artists and writers to grapple with themes of mortality and meaning. Sandburg’s exhortation to "let joy kill you" can be seen as a response to this cultural moment—a defiant assertion that even in the face of suffering, one must embrace life with full intensity. His rejection of "the little deaths" (a phrase that suggests the slow erosion of the spirit through routine, fear, or repression) aligns with broader modernist concerns about alienation and the dehumanizing effects of modern life.
Sandburg’s poem is striking in its economy of language, yet it employs several key literary devices to amplify its emotional impact. The most immediate of these is the imperative voice—commands such as "Let a joy keep you," "Reach out your hands," and "Let joy kill you!" create a sense of urgency, positioning the reader as an active participant in the poem’s vision rather than a passive observer. This rhetorical strategy aligns with Sandburg’s broader poetic project, which often sought to democratize poetry by making it accessible and immediate.
The central metaphor of the Apache dancer is crucial to the poem’s power. The dancer’s physicality—his act of clutching his woman—becomes a symbol of how joy should be seized: not timidly, but with a "terrible love" that is both exhilarating and destructive. The adjective "terrible" here is ambiguous, suggesting something awe-inspiring and overwhelming, even dangerous. This duality is central to Sandburg’s conception of joy—it is not a gentle, fleeting happiness but a force that can "smash" a person "to the heart / Under the ribs," leaving them forever changed.
The poem’s structure reinforces its thematic intensity. The lines are short and abrupt, mimicking the sudden, almost violent nature of the joy Sandburg describes. There is no leisurely buildup, no meditative reflection—only a series of sharp, arresting images that demand immediate emotional engagement. The repetition of "singing, singing" creates a rhythmic insistence, as if joy itself is a song that must be sung relentlessly, even in the face of destruction.
At its core, Joy is a poem about existential choice. Sandburg presents joy not as a passive state but as an active, almost militant stance toward life. His command to "let joy kill you" echoes Nietzsche’s concept of amor fati—the love of fate—which encourages individuals to embrace life in its entirety, including its suffering and inevitable end. The poem’s closing warning, "Keep away from the little deaths," suggests that the true danger lies not in the grand, all-consuming passions but in the slow, soul-crushing compromises of everyday existence.
This philosophy aligns with Sandburg’s own background as a populist poet who celebrated the vitality of ordinary people. His work often rejected the elitism of high modernism in favor of a more rugged, unpolished aesthetic, and Joy exemplifies this approach. The poem does not intellectualize its subject but instead embodies it, using visceral language and raw emotion to convey its message.
Sandburg’s Joy can be fruitfully compared to other works that explore the relationship between ecstasy and destruction. Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself similarly exalts in the sheer physicality of existence, though Whitman’s joy is more expansive and cosmic, whereas Sandburg’s is more urgent and immediate. Emily Dickinson’s "I taste a liquor never brewed" also deals with intoxicating joy, but her imagery is more ethereal, contrasting with Sandburg’s earthier, more violent metaphors.
A more contemporary parallel might be found in the works of Charles Bukowski, who likewise embraced a raw, unfiltered approach to emotion. However, where Bukowski’s joy is often tinged with cynicism, Sandburg’s remains defiantly hopeful, even in its fatalism.
Ultimately, Joy is a poem that demands to be felt as much as it is to be understood. Its power lies in its ability to evoke a visceral response—the reader is not merely told about joy but is commanded to experience it in its most extreme form. Sandburg’s insistence that joy should be pursued to the point of self-annihilation is both exhilarating and unsettling, forcing us to confront our own relationship with passion and restraint.
In a world that often encourages caution, moderation, and emotional reserve, Joy stands as a radical counterargument. It asks: What is life if not lived fiercely? What is joy if not seized with both hands, even at the risk of being shattered by it? Sandburg does not offer easy answers, but he does offer a challenge—one that remains as urgent today as it was when the poem was written.
By rejecting "the little deaths" in favor of a joy so overwhelming it might kill, Sandburg gives us not just a poem, but a manifesto for living. And in doing so, he reminds us of poetry’s unique power—to distill the vast, chaotic spectrum of human emotion into a few indelible lines that linger, like a song, long after they are first heard.
Click the button below to print a cloze exercise of the poem critique. This exercise is designed for classroom use.